― Advertisement ―

The New Luxury is a Better Life

For globally mobile citizens, the new luxury is not merely what one owns, but how well one lives, across borders, generations and experiences.
HomeRegionalAsia-PacificIs Japan Giving Away a City to Africa?

Is Japan Giving Away a City to Africa?

An IMGW News Report

It obviously isn’t. But the very idea that Japan might hand over sovereign territory to an African country was enough to stir up hysteria at home and bemusement abroad. What began as a cultural-exchange programme under the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) quickly morphed into viral misinformation, triggering a storm of complaints, xenophobic outbursts and government denials — and laying bare the anxieties of a country grappling with demographic decline and deep-seated unease about foreigners.

From “hometown” project to hoax

JICA had designated four Japanese cities as symbolic “hometowns” for African partners — Mozambique, Nigeria, Ghana and Tanzania — in an effort to encourage cultural exchange and revitalise depopulating regions. Within days, the scheme was misreported as a wholesale handover. Some African media even suggested that Nagai City in Yamagata Prefecture was being “given” to Tanzania.

Nagai City Hall, Japan

Nigeria’s government unwittingly fanned the flames by claiming that special visas for Nigerians would be created — before hurriedly retracting the announcement. The damage was done: in Imabari alone, officials logged 1,000 emails and 450 phone calls in a single day.

The backlash

On social media, commentary veered from anxious to openly racist. Critics invoked fears of crime, overstretched resources and “foreign dilution” of Japan’s culture. The government was eventually forced to intervene, with Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi insisting:

“There are no plans to promote the acceptance of immigrants or issue special visas for African residents.”

Authorities stressed that while JICA may host African interns, these would be temporary placements only.

JICA’s international outreach has even reached the airwaves of South Sudan, with coverage on South Sudan Radio & Television in Juba highlighting the agency’s overseas development work.

A demographic paradox

The fury surrounding an obviously false rumour points to Japan’s deeper paradox. The country is facing the lowest fertility rate in its modern history — just 1.20 births per woman in 2023 — and one of the fastest-shrinking populations in the developed world. Japan lost 800,000 people in 2023 alone, while a third of its population is already aged over 65.

By 2050, UN forecasts suggest the total population could fall below 105 million, down from more than 125 million today. The workforce is hollowing out; the pension burden is growing heavier.

“Unless it changes course, its biggest threat will not be the influx of foreigners, but the absence of them”

Yet despite these pressures, Japan has resisted large-scale immigration. Foreign residents have risen over the past decade from 2.23 million to 3.77 million, but they still account for only 3% of the total population. By comparison, Germany’s immigrant share is 18%, Canada’s 23%.


Comparative Data

Table 1. Fertility Rates (2023, births per woman)

Japan in stark contrast to peers

CountryFertility Rate
Japan1.20
Germany1.58
Canada1.49
United Kingdom1.55
OECD Average1.59

Table 2. Immigrants as Share of Population (2023, %)

Japan at the bottom among advanced economies

Country% of Population Foreign-born
Japan3%
Germany18%
Canada23%
United Kingdom15%
OECD Average14%

Politics of exclusion

The rise of the right-wing populist Sanseito party has made matters worse. Campaigning on a Trump-style “Japanese First” message, it tapped into grievances about stagnant wages, rising living costs and social insecurity — often by scapegoating foreigners.

A rally held by Sanseitō, a right-wing populist political party in Japan. The party was established in 2020 and secured a seat in the 2022 House of Councillors election, also becoming an official political party by winning more than 2% of the vote. The party advocates COVID-19 misinformation and anti-vaccine views. 

To its supporters, immigrants pose a threat rather than an economic necessity. But the numbers say otherwise. Without greater openness, labour shortages will deepen, productivity will falter, and the tax base needed to sustain Japan’s ageing society will shrink further.

The hoax that hit a nerve

The falsehood that Japan was “giving away” a city may have been laughable. The intensity of the backlash was not. It revealed the fragility of public attitudes toward immigration, and the yawning gap between demographic need and political will.

A global echo

Japan’s struggle is not unique. Across Europe and North America, far-right parties have turned migration into a wedge issue, capitalising on fears of cultural loss and economic insecurity. France, Austria and Italy are seeing resurgent nationalism, while in Britain and the United States populist rhetoric continues to dominate political debate.

The difference is that most Western economies, for all the noise, still rely heavily on immigration to plug demographic and labour gaps. Japan, by contrast, is holding the door firmly shut. Unless it changes course, its biggest threat will not be the influx of foreigners, but the absence of them.