An IMGlobalWealth.com News Report
Fresh data from Statistics Canada show that the gap between high- and low-income households reached record levels throughout 2025, reflecting a pattern that has persisted since the pandemic.
In the first quarter alone, the difference in disposable income share between the top 40% and bottom 40% hit roughly 49 percentage points, up from 43.8 points in 2021.
The drivers are familiar, but increasingly stark. Higher-income households have benefited disproportionately from investment gains and rising financial assets, while those at the bottom have seen wages stagnate or decline.

Among the poorest fifth of households, average wages actually fell slightly in early 2025, even as disposable income rose modestly through government transfers. By contrast, the richest households enjoyed income growth of nearly 8%, bolstered by both wages and investment returns. The divergence underscores a structural imbalance: capital is doing far more of the heavy lifting than labour.
Wealth inequality is even more pronounced. The top 20% of households now control roughly two-thirds of Canada’s net worth, around 65%, with average holdings exceeding C$3m. The bottom 40%, by comparison, account for barely 3% of total wealth.
The resulting wealth gap exceeded 60 percentage points in 2025 and continues to widen. This concentration is not merely a statistical curiosity. It shapes economic resilience.
Lower-income households are more exposed to shocks, with consumption outpacing income growth and savings deteriorating. Meanwhile, wealthier Canadians have been able to increase net savings, even amid a softer economic backdrop.
Macroeconomic conditions have amplified the divide. Cooling real estate markets have eroded the modest asset base of younger and less wealthy households, while strong financial markets have boosted portfolios at the top.

Declining interest rates have further squeezed lower-income groups reliant on savings income, even as they supported asset prices. The result is a bifurcated economy: one Canada tied to wages and housing costs, another to capital markets. That divergence helps explain why inequality has continued to rise even as inflation has eased and headline economic indicators appear stable.
If anything, the persistence of the gap suggests that policy responses, taxation, transfers, or labour-market reforms, have so far mitigated symptoms rather than altered the underlying trajectory.
The risk is that inequality becomes not cyclical, but structural: a defining feature of Canada’s post-pandemic economy.


